In 2024, the humanitarian community in the cross-border response has been discussing and implementing increasingly early recovery interventions, guided by a newly updated Early Recovery Strategy and Action Plan for north-west Syria. During an interview, the Early Recovery and Livelihoods Cluster Coordinator under UNDP, Wouter De Cuyper, shared his thoughts on this development, the challenges faced by partners and its potential implications on Syrian communities.
Early recovery is quite a technical term. How would you describe this type of work and why is it critical in the context of north-west Syria?
Wouter De Cuyper: Significant efforts toward early recovery have already been made in the cross-border response the past years to decrease communities’ dependency on aid, moving beyond providing temporary arrangements to more lasting solutions. This has been especially critical and challenging in a context such as north-west Syria with the protracted humanitarian crisis where the armed conflict has persisted for over 13 years.
Early Recovery is an approach that addresses recovery needs that arise during the humanitarian phase of an emergency, using humanitarian mechanisms that align with development principles. It enables people to use the benefits of humanitarian action to seize development opportunities, strengthens resilience, and establishes a sustainable process of recovery from crisis. It is a vital element of any effective humanitarian response and planning for early recovery should start when the crisis begins.
In north-west Syria, this has translated into early recovery programming related to livelihoods, basic infrastructure and rehabilitation, governance and capacity-building under all humanitarian clusters and sectors, including Food Security and Livelihoods, Health, Protection, Shelter/NFI, and so forth.
The humanitarian community completed the second review of the Inter-Cluster Early Recovery Strategy and Action Plan for North-west Syria in July. Could you tell us more about it?
Wouter De Cuyper: The overall early recovery strategy is to take an inclusive approach that is complementary to the two-year Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP), with all sectors integrating early recovery into their strategies to address current needs and prevent future ones through a balanced combination of emergency and early recovery assistance. The strategy and its four objectives were developed in consultation with affected communities in north-west Syria. All early recovery actions are shaped by guiding principles and standards, obligations resulting from international human rights conventions and international humanitarian law, with the centrality of protection, linkages to climate change and disaster risk reduction, and considerations of gender equality, social inclusion and local ownership.
What would you say are the key challenges faced by the Early Recovery and Livelihood Cluster in 2024?
Wouter De Cuyper: There are several challenges that the Cluster and its partners have been facing, including decreased funding from donors, coordination with other Clusters at the field level, community-based organizations and the private sector, and integration of issues related to environment and climate change . Reduced donor funding this year has been affecting our partners' capacity and reach significantly. We have seen a reduction in activities related to both livelihoods (employment creation) and infrastructure rehabilitation (roads, schools, health facilities) compared to 2023. In our June survey, over 60 per cent of our partners reported a reduction of funding between 25 per cent and 75 per cent for 2024. Over a third of our partners reported having to reduce the number of people supported by 50 to 75 per cent due to reduced funding.
In 2024, the ERL cluster only received 18 per cent of the funding (out of $90.3 M). How has this affected your activities so far and what is at risk if this funding trajectory continues until the end of the year?
Wouter De Cuyper: Without early recovery projects restoring services and supporting sustainable livelihoods, we can expect prolonged poor economic conditions for people in north-west Syria, resulting in worsening emergency life-saving needs, deteriorating services, and higher risk of reliance on negative coping mechanisms, including borrowing resulting in debts, child labour, increased exposure to sexual exploitation, etc. to make ends meet. Reduced access to livelihood opportunities will widen the gap between income and expenditure required to meet basic needs. Reduced access to essential services, including affordable access to electricity, will jeopardize the positive impact of livelihoods programming. Lack of funding for both access to livelihoods, ability to meet basic needs, and the availability and affordability of infrastructure and services will threaten the resilience and social cohesion.